CNN regains its old 90s title

Remember when CNN didn’t stand for hopelessly incompetent lies told straightfaced to the camera by Kristian Amanpour, but rather “Corruption, Nausea, and Nonsense?”

Michelle Malkin (yes, I know, but she’s on it, so…) has got a more advanced description of last night’s shenanigans than is floating around elsewhere.

Sticking a campaign activist into the debate is only a taste of what happens with CNN when a Clinton’s available.  Scandal after tasteless, tacky, tawdry, puerile scandal.And, besides the fact that she’s so class-less as to abuse her Secret Service detail, this is why I, who am pretty much going to stay home on next election night, will instead crawl naked over broken glass in order to vote against another eight years of Clinton-managed scandal-of-the-week.

Leave a comment


  1. Zathras

     /  December 1, 2007

    Is MM able to give a more advanced description of anything?

  2. happycrow

     /  December 1, 2007

    No, not really: she’s pretty soundbyte. Ordinarily I wouldn’t link her at all. The data’s been backed up, though.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • Featured Eyeballs

  • What’s today again?

    November 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct   Dec »
  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 133,057 hits
  • Recent Comments

    Cults and Context |… on So, about that Bruce Jenner…
    Cults and Context |… on Yes, I AM, in fact, looking at…
    Cults and Context |… on How The Internet Says “D…
    Kat Laurange on Hungarian Military Sabre …
    Kat Laurange on Rose Garden! The Home Edi…
  • Advertisements
    %d bloggers like this: