MacKenzie: NATO is shirking

No shit?  Check for political language, and even the NATO website describes meetings held to determine whether or not NATO members actually have any intention of fulfilling their treaty obligations.

And the shirking is going to continue for the foreseeable future, because the chances of the US responding to the post-9/11 environment with “you failed your Chapter 5 obligations, therefore we are no longer in alliance with you” is unfortunately unlikely.

Though such a move would be quite the “muscle tonic” for our allies.  And, for those of you who don’t have the background, this IS one of our allies talking.

Previous Post
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • Featured Eyeballs

  • What’s today again?

    August 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Jul   Sep »
  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 133,176 hits
  • Recent Comments

    Cults and Context |… on So, about that Bruce Jenner…
    Cults and Context |… on Yes, I AM, in fact, looking at…
    Cults and Context |… on How The Internet Says “D…
    Kat Laurange on Hungarian Military Sabre …
    Kat Laurange on Rose Garden! The Home Edi…
  • Advertisements
    %d bloggers like this: