Gait recognition — a waste of time.

It’s a nice idea, but, um, sorry, no cigar.  Sure, different people walk differently, but anybody who knows how can easily make serious alterations to their “walking style” that completely change the game based on where you choose to put the effort and where you choose to make the joints more active.

Now, will most crooks be able to do this?  Probably not.  If they had anything resembling patience, they wouldn’t be your typical impulse-control-disabled little goblins.

But enough people will be able to do so that there’s no way this will ever hold up in court.

Next Post
Leave a comment


  1. I mostly concur — the more important thing would be from where sampled. I have five gaits:
    1. raw gait
    2. bouncy, boxing-esqu lemur
    3. pinwheel’d pillar & post
    4. shift-walking (no good description for you)
    5. covering distance

    … but, while I shift among them sometimes willfully, if I were committing a crime I’d certainly have more on my mind than which gait I was using — it’s very likely that my raw gait would end up being used.

    Perhaps the only way that would foil anything was if someone kept a gait in reserve specifically for use while committing crimes, and hoped that such activity wouldn’t require use of a gait that one of London’s normal surveillance cameras might detect. That seems a long-shot. I’d say that should keep spending money on it.

  2. I guarantee you that I could do precisely that. Now, granted, maybe the average crook couldn’t… but how many above-average crooks does it take to make something inadmissable?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • Featured Eyeballs

  • What’s today again?

    July 2006
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 133,067 hits
  • Recent Comments

    Cults and Context |… on So, about that Bruce Jenner…
    Cults and Context |… on Yes, I AM, in fact, looking at…
    Cults and Context |… on How The Internet Says “D…
    Kat Laurange on Hungarian Military Sabre …
    Kat Laurange on Rose Garden! The Home Edi…
  • Advertisements
    %d bloggers like this: