Altimeter group missing store-brand appeal

CNN has a post up on why people tend to be moving to generics, and why retail giants like Wal-Mart may be encouraging this by dropping brand products.

Altimeter Group’s Cecera believes consumers stand to win from the retailers’ moves.

“In this recession, consumers have certainly become less discriminating with what they buy,” said Cecera. “Consumers have rushed to value prices, and they are buying generic brands.”

I think they’re slightly off base here.  While some bargain shopping definitely fits the bill if there’s no perceived increase in value — for instance, is a bag of brand-name dried beans more likely to be higher-quality than a bag of store-brand dried beans?  — there are other circumstances where that falls down.

Our case in point involves diapers.  Our local store brand produces a cheaper, superior diaper than any of the major brand-labels we’ve tried.  And every time we’ve travelled and been away from our local chain, oh have we tried them.  The simple fact is that the down-scale product is the demonstrably superior product.  Is that because there’s less money going into branding?  Or did this one product just happen to score? 

Either way, the appeal of a brand is that it makes a claim to superior quality.  If there’s nothing backing that claim except a fancier box, or else obvious “add-on” gimmicks designed to sucker the unwary, that brand is likely to be in trouble.   (e.g., all the hoo-ha that goes on with multiple-blade men’s razors, when anybody can tell you that a single sharp blade, be it safety-razor or cheapo disposable, does a vastly better job without getting clogged up, thus physically forcing the cutting edge away from where it’s supposed to cut).

Some may posit that this is a short-term trend, but given what I see as fundamental structural changes to our economy and looming stealth-inflation, I think this is likely to be a long-term reality instead.

Old Age or Cancer choice confirmed

It’s being presented as if this were new news, but apparently the bright boys and girls who brought us the “why does senescence happen” ugliness have managed to confirm their findings, and it’s leaking out into the press.

 I see this as unadulterated good news.  If “aging” is the direct result of a body’s response to DNA damage, then it makes significant sense to start hurling research dollars into that field — because that threatens not only to get us closer to extending quality life, but ALSO gets to the heart of a number of other issues, such as viral infections, etcetera.  Recall that several cancers are now strongly suspected to be the direct result of viral infections inflicting precisely this sort of damage.

As Glenn Reynolds says, I think “faster, please” is the operative phrase.

  • Featured Eyeballs

  • What’s today again?

    February 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 124,615 hits
  • Recent Comments

    www.ebisawa-ss.com on New Link: Time Highway
    0jr on Batshit-Crazy in Budapest
    0jr on Batshit-Crazy in Budapest
    Yet More Infantilizi… on Everything you know is….…
    Yet More Infantilizi… on Dread for the Future: is it Cl…
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 220 other followers