Sheesh. Lay off the kid, will ya? He took the shot, it was clean and done with. You may not have been keeping track of current events lately, but it’s not just cops and soldiers who have access to high-speed body armor nowadays.
All posts for the month October, 2006
Isoceles fanatics jumping all over a small boy
Posted by happycrow on October 11, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/isoceles-fanatics-jumping-all-over-a-small-boy/
Soldier Tech Bonanza
Get this into the field.
And while we’re at it, I want a vial of the stuff over my kitchen sink.
Posted by happycrow on October 11, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/soldier-tech-bonanza/
Holy Crap, Zucker’s on fire…
I don’t like to Drudge real often… that’s like offering a cup of coffee to Juan Valdez and his burro.
But if you haven’t seen this… I can’t tell what’s worse: how vicious it is, or how accurate.
Posted by happycrow on October 11, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/holy-crap-zuckers-on-fire/
American Naivete
I think that we have a big problem in our public discourse, insofar as we paint great big pictures with wide, wide brushes. Is Islam a religion of peace, or else a bunch of froth-mouthed misogynistic troglodytes?
We have this tendency to use a shorthand that is convenient for us, and then to suffer disillusionment. Once that happens, we tend to get angry and start breaking things.
And, don’t get me wrong: sometimes “breaking things” was precisely what we should have been doing in the first place. But, just like most Americans mistakenly viewed the Soviet Union as a monolithic organization… I start to wonder how many of our current ways of looking at foreign-policy problems are based on convenient illusions.
Posted by happycrow on October 10, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/american-naivete/
Contingencies 2A
I open discussion for a media surveillance strategy that has me moving before the needle hits DefCon 1.
Also, suggestions for a cross country trip would be welcome, as well as advice on transportation out of the country. I don’t want to become an evacuation movie cliche.
Posted by blackpine on October 10, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/contingencies-2a/
Part 2: contingencies and options.
Japan will rearm, and South Korea will reexamine the departure of US troops and what effective levels of armament they can domestically sustain (a lot less).
Possibly the U.S. will start playing hardball with China through Taiwan. They screwed us in Korea, we’ll screw right back.
Attempts to support a coup/revolution/regime change in North Korea. The idea is to get this done before NK sells stuff to people we don’t like.
Heightened naval presence and security in NE Asia.
So, first set of contigencies, we attempt to topple North Korea: can they react? Their army can’t really power project. The story told to the infantry is that North Korea can get to Busan in a week. I don’t think that’s likely. Also, China would intervene, presently.
My thinking is that China would react for them. But what can they really do? Give North Korea nukes? I think the US has a lot of leeway here. There are now open demonstartions of dissent in the North, albeit small. However, consider what that means. Neighborhoods are organized along Korean traditional lines into communal associations called gye. Each gye consists of five families who help each other, with one or two who are politically connected. That means for every one act of sedition, there are at least one and possibly four other families who are in on it. And one of them is possibly party. When party membership is no longer inducement to loyalty, you’re in trouble.
North Korea the country is actually quite small, if you follow the lines of what a nation state does. A nation is meant to deliver certain services to it’s internal constituency. In such a case as North Korea, the services delivered are only to the Party and the Army. The rest of the populace are counted as a resource. Insert joke about Communist and Socialist governments here, and then realize that North Korea doesn’t have 23 million citizens with a 1 million man army, it has one or two million citizens exerting continuous force over 20 million non belligerent tenant farmers. The farmers know they’re being screwed.
So, we try to topple them, and we either succeed or fail. Success, in the American terms of it, would be to have the area come under the control of a new regime with whom we can deal, who isn’t a belligerant, and who either leaves the balance of power untipped, or tipped in our favor in such a fashion so as not to aggravate China. The Kim family will not see another generation in power, China will not tolerate it. Lacking our scruples, they would more than happily simply hold a coup and grill a brisket, and Tibet the place: no more Korean language, no korean in political power, and heavy settlement by Chinese. Any Korean successor will quietly kill any Kim family relative they can lay their hands on. That’s Stalinism after all. So, peaceful domestic transition is unlikely, and any answer that maintains the status quo is unlikely.
But if we let China have it, we can at least talk with China. What China does to one of it’s proxies is truly none of our concern, and nothing brings an ally to your side like the barbarians at his gate. South Korea with China directly on its border would be interesting to watch.
Failure. War? The Kim dynasty ends with Jong Il. China will eventually go to war with us. Chinese troops will do the most of the heavy punching, even on the Korean penninsula no matter what. The North Koreans would be too inneffective. Failure would have to be the insertion of a competent, pro-Chinese dictator who was better than Kim Jong-Il, who can actually make Korea more effective for the eventual fight with China. That may be unrealistic too. North Korea is good and proper screwed. There is not the human infrastructure to build a real nation. China would basically have to replace every korean person with a Chinese person, which they can do with one tenth of their excess, marriagable male population.
Any different reads on this? Is North Korea the next Tibet?
Posted by blackpine on October 9, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/09/part-2-contingencies-and-options/
North Korean Nuclear Testing: Thinking Aloud.
The North Koreans have tested their nuclear warheads underground, on ChuSeok weekend (Korean Harvest Festival/Thanksgiving). The South Korean students I have talked with have been absolutely unperturbed. They feel that war is far away, and perhaps they are right. It’s hard to reduce the information to any inevitabilities just yet. Let’s think aloud, shall we?
First, why the tests. Easy: marketing. North Korea, politically speaking is a swamp. Everything is foetid and still. The balance is very precarious, and a better man than myself has asked the question we’ve been waiting years and years, with all our ears for. When comes the Ceaucesu moment?
NoKo is so precarious, they can’t even allow Chinese non military personnel into the place for fear of destabilization. If fat, happy, mercantile Chinese come in to give you free food, then maybe their ideas will carry more currency. This isn’t too much of a problem at present because the Chinese, as a people, regard North Korea in much the same way that the Fascist Germany regarded Italy: politically reliable boobs. This has changed with the refusal to stand down on the nuclear testing, and with the discovery that the NoKos have been counterfitting Yuan notes, but they haven’t been demoted much: from reliable to useful.
Anyway, moving along those lines, if the Chinese are a risk, and generally unwilling to help the North, what are the other options? Well fed and civil Japanese? Americans? Indians? All well fed, well educated, and showing up to just give you food? The worst would be South Koreans, all of them 4 cm taller on average, well fed, with cell phones, and millions of tons of rice to hand out. My guess is that the confiscation of the international food aid is being spun inside North Korea as a global famine that the North is weathering, but that the neighboring countries are being made to pay tribute to the DPRK military. They would put it in papers, but really they’re too polite. That would also explain the relatively bombast free way in which they sent food progam folks home. “We don’t need your food, keep some for yourself, it’s a brave front you’re putting up, but the DPRK will be kind.”
Anyway, how then do they trade? By channelling foreign currency by way of drug sales, human traficking (Chinese farmers buy wives from Korea for about $3,000. Chinese immigration is alleged to be cracking down and deporting the Korean wives and the half Korean children. This doesn’t include international sales straight into prostitution/sex slavery).
http://www.parapundit.com/archives/002121.html – 38k
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41966-2003Oct3?language=printer
What happens to the returmnees and their kids is not pleasant, according to rumor.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,1136483,00.html
So they market humans, meth, and counterfeit bills.
http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/rm/21044.htm
They also try to market rocket technology and rocket bodies.
http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/nkorea/bm2003.htm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,72812,00.html
So what happens to you market for missiles when your biggest product blows up 43 second after launch? You move to item two. Nuclear warheads. It did work. They didn’t release news of their test until after the South Korean government announced a hot on their seismic sensors.
America and the surrounding countries that don’t like drugs, conterfeit bills and rocket technology flowing freely have been cracking down. Even China has gotten in on this. That shuts down the tap on hard currency going into the country. They therefore can’t pay for anything that makes life comfortable. They can’t buy parts for their military vehicles, can’t purchase oil or natural gas (and China has punitavely reduced the shipments of late), can’t purchase luxury items or prestige items. No foreign currency means no guns and no butter.
So what have they got left to sell? Nukes. Nukes to whoever wants them. That’s why Chris Hill said that the DPRK can either have nukes or a future. The conversation between the DPRK and the US is about the flow of foreign hard capital. North Korea has said that if they will not be allowed to sell drugs, people and countefeit bills, then they will sell their world famous, fully functional nuclear technology and intact nuclear weapons. Hill said, if you do that you’ll go away.
Now, this doesn’t mean war, neccessarily. Not immediately.
I think that the U.S. government has just become very interested in toppling the North Korean government.
Now here are the options that I see. We topple them before they can sell weapons to someone who we really don’t want to have them. What now? Here are some options:
- Annexation by China
- Reclaimation by ROK
- North Korea being monitored by UN
- North Korea being monitored by SEATO
So let’s think aloud. I’ll post some more later. Still playing with the spell check.
Posted by blackpine on October 9, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/09/north-korean-nuclear-testing-thinking-aloud/
Another Putin opponent assassinated.
Clean professional hit: one in the chest, one in the head, pistol left at scene. Nobody’s going to try to call this a random crime.
Anna Politkovskaya, Andrei Kozlov, plus Khodorkovsky, the insane anti-Georgian fervor being whipped up in Russian media… the writing is on the wall in ten-foot neon letters: the borderline between Putin’s government and Stalin’s is looking pretty thin.
Posted by happycrow on October 8, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/another-putin-opponent-assassinated/
I don’t care if Hy-wire is geeky…
That’s my kind of car. I will drive my Saturn into the freaking ground for as long as it takes for this sucker to get to market. I will then pay extra money for the privelege of swapping drivers on road trips while my more-fashionable neighbors desperately hunt for footroom…
push come to shove, I’ll start a business renting custom shells for folks who want hatchbacks and beach-cruisers on weekends…
Posted by happycrow on October 4, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/04/i-dont-care-if-hy-wire-is-geeky/
Retiring Baby Boomers to Strain US
To strain us? Because they’re retiring?
I don’t know how you’d describe the baby boomers, but “retiring” is the last word I’d use…
So let me get this straight. The most self-interested generation in American history,
- anti-military and pro-peace, unless you count abusing the poor working-class schmucks who couldn’t get draft deferments
- pro-government regulation, so long as it’s not their pot being regulated
- pro-hippie anti-capitalism until they’re out of school and stand to make a buck, thus metamorphosing out of their flower-power chrysales into yuppie scum…
is going to allow any reform of the entitlement programs, now that they’re the ones set to receive benefits?
Say what you like about generational conflicts and baby boomers. After all, they invented it. But the folks like me coming right after these guys have known for years that
- the government entitlement programs are an unsustainable Ponzi scheme
- the generational bulge of the boomers will result in horrific debts that the Boomers will simply ignore.
This is supposed to be a news flash? I remember discussing this when I was twelve. We were warning each other about this back when we were teenagers sitting in our driveways: that we’d better bust ass and save money, because there wasn’t going to be anything coming out of government programs to help us. I don’t know a single person in my generation who actually thinks that Social Security will be anything other than a tax they pay their entire lives, and from which they will never receive any benefit… and the only people in my generation I can think of who think of retirement being an option at all are folks who are saving 50% or more of their post-tax income while working massive hours in order to save enough that they no longer have to work.
Posted by happycrow on October 4, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/04/retiring-baby-boomers-to-strain-us/
Denny Hastert to Step Down?
The Washington Times came out swinging for his resignation.
I wish.
Denny Haster’s know-nothing, go-along-to-get-along, looking-the-other-way tactics on pork and anything else that’s actually meaningful to folks whose idea of the Republicans wasn’t steel tariffs and yet more government entitlement giveaways has been a complete and unmitigated disaster for the Republican Party who makes Hillary Clinton look both principled and articulate.
He’ll be dragged out kicking, because he’s a “Country Club Republican” who cares only about mechanical governance, rather than any actual ideas…
Posted by happycrow on October 3, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/03/denny-hastert-to-step-down/
Weird Al on MySpace
Weird Al made the parodies.
Poked at the fevered egos of the entertainment world. With their willing support.
And he, along with his versatile, kick-ass band, has outlasted them all.
So perhaps it’s not surprising that somebody would pose as him on MySpace. But oh, how pathetic to do so…
Posted by happycrow on October 1, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/weird-al-on-myspace/
The List
Now that I’ve left the Bank, and I’ll be interviewing for teaching gigs, “the list” of things to be achieved is beginning to take shape… I’m going to be a very, very busy Happycrow.
Posted by happycrow on October 1, 2006
http://happycrow.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/the-list/
